I'm getting my rig ready for the MSFS 2024 launch and want to make sure I can actually max everything out this time. I'm currently running at 4K on a large display, but I also do a lot of VR flying with my Reverb G2, which we all know is a total system killer. Iβve been looking at the RTX 4090, but with the 50-series rumors swirling, I'm torn on whether to pull the trigger now or wait. Does the new engine's improved multithreading and streaming tech mean I can get away with something slightly lower, or is the 4090 still the only real choice for smooth 4K ultra settings?
Seconding the recommendation above. Honestly, for the HP Reverb G2 VR Headset, you need every bit of VRAM you can get. The 2024 engine handles assets better, but the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB is still the only card that handles high-res VR textures without stuttering... basically, its the 24GB buffer that saves you. If you can wait, the 50-series might be better, but the 4090 is still the king for 4K ultra. gl!
So basically the consensus is that the 2024 engine is better, but VR still eats hardware for breakfast. Everyone seems to agree that the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB is the current king, but i'm honestly kinda worried about the safety and longevity of buying one right now...
I've seen so many horror stories about the power connectors melting on those high-draw cards if they aren't seated perfectly, and it makes me super nervous recommending it! If you do go for it, basically you gotta:
1. Use a high-quality Corsair RM1200x Shift 80 PLUS Gold or similar PSU to handle those spikes safely.
2. Double-check that 12VHPWR cable is clicked in ALL the way so it doesnt overheat.
3. Consider waiting for the 50-series just cuz it might have a safer power design??
Idk, I had a bad experience with a cheaper card once and now I'm super cautious. MSFS 2024 is gonna be heavy regardless, so maybe just wait a bit longer to be safe! gl!
Just sharing my experience: I went through this exact internal battle last year when I was upgrading for the current sim. I'm definitely not a pro at all the technical specs, but I've been simming for years and honestly, the price tag on the top-tier cards always makes me sweat a little lol. I ended up grabbing the current flagship NVIDIA card because I was tired of my VR stuttering on the Reverb, and while it was *painfully* expensive, itβs the first time I've actually been satisfied with my performance. I think I heard someone say the 50-series might be a massive jump, but iirc, people say that every single cycle and then the top card is hard to find for months anyway. Iβm happy I didn't wait because Iβve had a solid year of flying already. It basically boils down to whether you want to fly smooth right now or gamble on maybe saving some cash later... but yeah, for 4K and VR, it really feels like you gotta pay to play. 👍
> Does the new engine's improved multithreading and streaming tech mean I can get away with something slightly lower, or is the 4090 still the only real choice for smooth 4K ultra settings? I would suggest taking a very methodical approach to this upgrade. If you are concerned about the technical risks mentioned earlier, you might want to consider two distinct paths:
For your situation, Iβd actually be a bit cautious about rushing in right now. In my experience, flight sims are always total hardware hogs because of how they render stuff like distant terrain and complex weather... basically, it's just a lot of data to move. Even though the 2024 engine has better multithreading, that mostly helps with CPU bottlenecks and loading times, not necessarily the raw pixel pushing needed for 4K or high-res VR.
Over the years, I've found that the Reverb G2 is super sensitive to frame timing, so you reallyyy want the most stable VRAM buffer possible to avoid stutters. Honestly, buying the current top-tier card right before a new series drops feels a bit risky to me. I'd suggest waiting a few months to see if the rumors are true... itβs the safer bet for such a big investment. If you want a smooth experience without constant tweaking, waiting for the next flagship is probably the way to go tbh.
Basically sounds like the consensus is that the power is there with the current flagship, but the 50-series rumors and safety concerns are making everyone hesitate. I'm totally with AuroraArtisan on the connector issues... that stuff honestly terrifies me as someone still learning the ropes. From a long-term ownership perspective, I think reliability and not stressing about your hardware failing is worth more than a few extra frames. I'd rather have a system that lasts five years without a hitch than the fastest one that might have thermal or power issues. Definitely worth being cautious imo.
I actually have to respectfully disagree with the wait and see approach. I have been using the current flagship for a while now, and from a long-term ownership perspective, waiting for the 50-series might just leave you on the sidelines for the best part of the MSFS 2024 launch cycle.