How much VRAM is ne...
 
Notifications
Clear all

How much VRAM is needed for training stable diffusion models?

7 Posts
8 Users
0 Reactions
41 Views
0
Topic starter

Hey everyone! I’ve been diving deep into the world of AI art lately, and I’m finally ready to move past just generating images and start training my own models. I really want to try my hand at fine-tuning a Stable Diffusion XL (SDXL) model using Kohya_ss or maybe some DreamBooth training, but I’m getting mixed signals about the hardware requirements.

Right now, I’m rocking an RTX 3060 with 12GB of VRAM, and while it’s great for basic generation, I’m worried it’s going to hit a wall once I start the actual training process. I’ve heard some people say 12GB is the bare minimum if you use optimizations like xformers and 8-bit Adam, but others claim you really need at least 16GB or even 24GB to avoid those dreaded 'Out of Memory' errors, especially for higher resolution training or larger batch sizes.

I’m trying to decide if I can make my current setup work with some clever optimizations, or if it’s time to bite the bullet and upgrade to a 3090 or 4090. If I want to train high-quality LoRAs or full checkpoints without the process taking days or crashing constantly, what is the realistic VRAM sweet spot I should be aiming for?


7 Answers
11

In my experience, 12GB is basically the "get your foot in the door" level for SDXL, but it’s highkey frustrating if you want to do more than just simple LoRAs. If you’re serious about high-quality training without your PC sounding like it’s gonna explode, you really need to look at cards with more headroom.

So basically, here are the technical sweet spots for a smooth workflow:

* **The Gold Standard:** NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB is the absolute best value right now if you buy used. That 24GB VRAM lets you run larger batch sizes and higher resolutions (like 1024x1024) without breaking a sweat.
* **The Modern Powerhouse:** If you want new with a warranty, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB is insane. It's not just the VRAM; the speed increase for training is literally night and day compared to the 30-series.
* **The Mid-Range Compromise:** If those are too pricey, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super 16GB is a solid middle ground. 16GB is enough to run Kohya_ss comfortably with optimizations like Gradient Checkpointing turned on.

Honestly, I was satisfied with 12GB for a bit, but once I upgraded to 24GB, I never looked back. It just works so much better lol. Peace!


11

Seconding the recommendation above! Honestly, like others said, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB is okay to start, but SDXL is a beast compared to 1.5. If you're going the DIY route and want to avoid constant OOM errors, you gotta understand that VRAM isn't just for the model; it's for the gradients and optimizer states too. Basically, when you use 8-bit Adam, you're saving space, but high-res training still eats memory fast.

I've been super satisfied with a slightly different DIY approach tho. If you aren't ready to drop 2k on a new card, have you looked at the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB used? I picked one up and the 24GB is literally the sweet spot. It lets you run larger batches without needing gradient checkpointing, which usually slows things down by 20-30%. Plus, you can actually train at 1024x1024 comfortably. It works well and I have no complaints so far, definitely beats struggling with 12GB i think!


5

Did this last week, worked perfectly


3

Honestly, I'm a bit of a beginner too and I've been super cautious about overspending. If you're looking for value, here's how I see it:

1. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs your current card: The extra VRAM is a lifesaver for SDXL LoRAs without breaking the bank, but the bus width is kinda slow.
2. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB: Buying this used is probably the best bang for your buck. That 24GB means you basically never see OOM errors.

I guess 12GB works, but it's risky? gl!


3

I spent months wrestling with a 3060 and honestly, it felt like trying to park a truck in a closet. SDXL training is a whole different beast compared to 1.5. In my experience, if you're planning on doing this long-term, you should look beyond just the standard gaming cards everyone talks about. I've tried several setups over the years and the workstation line is surprisingly solid for AI work because of the stability. Basically, here's what worked for me when I got tired of the constant OOM errors:

  • Used Workstation Cards: I picked up a NVIDIA RTX A4000 16GB second-hand. It's a single-slot card so it fits in almost any case and that 16GB of VRAM is way more stable for SDXL than a 12GB card ever will be.
  • Cloud Training: Sometimes it's just better to rent. I started using services to spin up an NVIDIA A100 80GB PCIe for big projects. It costs maybe a dollar an hour and finishes training before I even finish my coffee.
  • Secondary GPU: I actually kept my old card just to run my monitors. Letting your main training card focus 100 percent on the compute without Windows taking its cut is a huge help. Tbh, dont feel like you have to buy a 4090 right away. A used pro card or a few bucks in the cloud goes a long way when you're first starting out...


1

Honestly, I've been there and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB is kinda a struggle for SDXL training. It's technically possible with 8-bit Adam and low ranks, but it's sooo slow and crashes constantly.

Here's how the value stacks up:
* **Budget King:** NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB (around $280) - Bare minimum, lots of OOM errors.
* **Sweet Spot:** NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB (used for ~$700) - Best value for serious training. That 24GB VRAM is basically required if you dont wanna pull ur hair out.
* **Premium:** NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB ($1600+) - Fast, but pricey.

I'd suggest looking for a used 3090... honestly, the extra VRAM makes a HUGE difference for SDXL.


1

Yo! Just saw this thread and honestly, I feel you so much on the VRAM struggle. I've been doing a ton of market research on this lately because the hardware gap for SDXL training is actually pretty huge. Basically, SDXL has about 3x the parameters of SD 1.5, so the mathematical "workspace" your GPU needs for backpropagation and gradient calculation is massive.

Looking at the current market, it's a bit of a weird landscape. While the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB looks amazing on paper with all that memory for the price, NVIDIA still wins hands-down for training because of the CUDA ecosystem. Honestly, trying to get Kohya_ss or similar tools running smoothly on AMD or even the Intel Arc A770 16GB can be such a headache... i think? You end up spending more time troubleshooting drivers than actually training stuff.

For your situation, 12GB is basically just "surviving" with optimizations. To really THRIVE and make high-quality LoRAs without the process taking a week, you want more headroom. While some people mentioned the 16GB range as a compromise, if you're serious about full checkpoints, you really need to aim for the 24GB tier.

I've compared the specs and pricing, and right now a used NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB is the absolute best value play compared to the super pricey NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB. Having 24GB is the REAL sweet spot because you can actually use larger batch sizes, which helps the model learn better and faster. Trust me, once you switch to a 24GB card, it's a total game changer!! gl with the upgrade!


Share: